Was James Cook really a Captain?
When Cook set sail in 1768 on his first voyage of discovery aboard Endeavour he held the rank of lieutenant. Soon after his return to England in 1771 he was promoted to the rank of commander. He never actually held the rank of captain, but in 1775 was promoted to the higher rank of post-captain.
Any person in charge of a ship is known as its captain, and so it was quite natural to refer to him as Captain Cook.
Are there any living descendants of Captain Cook?
James and Elizabeth Cook had 6 children. 3 of them died in infancy. Two of the others (James and Nathaniel) died at sea whilst serving in the Royal Navy. The youngest of the family, Hugh Cook, died whilst at college at Cambridge. None of their children had married and had children of their own, so there are no descendants from the Cook family.
Are there any living relatives of Captain Cook?
Yes - James Cook's sister Margaret married James Fleck, and their children married and had children of their own. Today there are many descendants of the Fleck family spread around the World. All can claim Captain Cook to be their great, great, etc... uncle.
Was Captain Cook born at Whitby or Staithes?
He was not born at either town. He was born on 27 October 1728 at the small village of Marton in North Yorkshire. Today Marton has become a suburb of the large town of Middlesbrough on Teesside.
What were the names of Captain Cook's ships?
Captain Cook sailed on three voyages of discovery and used the following ships -
1768 - 1771 Endeavour
1772 - 1775 Resolution (with a companion vessel Adventure)
1776 - 1780 Resolution (with a companion vessel Discovery)
Was Captain Cook really eaten by cannibals?
No - the Hawaiian Islanders who killed Captain Cook were not cannibals.
They believed that the power of a man was in his bones, so they cooked part of Cook's body to enable the bones to be easily removed. It was the cooking of his body which gave rise to the rumour of cannibalism.
Where is Captain Cook buried?
Captain Cook was killed at Hawaii on 14 February 1779. A week later his remains were formally buried at sea in Kealakekua Bay, Hawaii.
Updated: October 2008
Chris, why Cook never received any award in recognition for his achievements has puzzled many people. The explanation is that a knighthood, or similar honours which were the gift of the King, could not be awarded retrospectively, or posthumously. And that is still the case today.
I have often wandered, as an Australian, why James Cook was never knighted for his discovering of the great Southern land. Was it due to his junior ranking as an officer in the Rn? Does anybody know?
Byron, Cook's encounter with the Mi'kmaq people received only the briefest of mentions in the ship's log. The entry for 20th May 1767, when they were at the head of St. George's Bay, in a place they called St. George's Harbour, states "Found here a tribe of the Mickmak Indians".
Kerman, I agree that would have been nice to see Cook receive some award as acknowledgement for his achievements. It is possible that following his third voyage he would have been made an Admiral. But those titles which the King could award in the 18th century could not be given posthumously. His family was awarded a coat of arms, and the King granted them a substrata trial pension, but that was all he could do.
Hello, I was wondering whether he was ever honoured by the monarchy of the time? Was this a 'done' thing for ship captains? Is it possible to posthumously give an award? It seems it would be appropriate given his accomplishments. Many
Hi I'm looking for info about James cooks incounter with the mickmack peoples on may 15 1776 in st Georges bay as written about in cooks charts of newfoundland any info you could offer would be greatly apreachated. Thank you in advance Nothern Buffalo
Capt Cooks life inspires me to keep my dreams of adventure and discovery alive
Graham, Captain Cook was using the term "bluff" in the nautical sense, meaning a cliff or headland. So his Cape 3 Points were not 3 elevated hills, but headlands into the sea. You can see them if you look at them using Google Earth. They form the northern headland to Broken Bay. Cook notes in his journal that he measured their Longitude as 33 degrees 33 minutes which may have influenced his choice of name. On Google Earth I make the coordinates out to be 33 degrees 31minutes South, 151 degrees 25 minutes East.
Can someone please tell me exactly which body of land Cook was looking at when he named Cape 3 Points on the 7th May 1770, which he described in his journal as "High land with 3 Bluff Points". In other words what are the "3 Points" and their co-ordinates? TIA
Loved reading the information.
It has come to our attention that spam mailers (senders of bulk unsolicited e-mail) have been forging their mail with this domain as the point of origin. As a matter of policy, we do not send out e-mail from our domain name. If you have received an email that appears to be from "@CaptainCookSociety.com" it was forged and sent without our consent, knowledge, or the use of our servers.
1755 - 1757
1772 - 1779